VLF Test – Applications, Advantages and disadvantages, Alternatives and Standards

What is a VLF (Very Low Frequency) Test?

Very Low Frequency (VLF) testing with Tan Delta (Loss Angle) and/or VLF withstand testing, particularly for medium voltage (MV) and high voltage (HV) cable insulation assessment.

VLF testing is a diagnostic method used to assess the insulation integrity of medium and high-voltage power cables (typically 6.6 kV and above). It applies an AC voltage at a frequency of 0.1 Hz or lower, which significantly reduces the power requirement compared to 50/60 Hz testing while still stressing the insulation similarly.

VLF testing is commonly combined with:

  • VLF Tan Delta (TD): Measures dielectric losses and insulation condition.

  • VLF Withstand Test: Applies a high VLF voltage to check if insulation holds (go/no-go test).

  • VLF Partial Discharge (PD) Testing: Detects internal insulation defects.

Applications of VLF Testing

  1. Commissioning of new cables (MV/HV, e.g., 11 kV, 33 kV)

  2. Maintenance testing of aged cables

  3. Cable fault location support

  4. Assessment after repairs or splices

  5. Predictive maintenance in asset management

Advantages of VLF Testing

  • Lower power requirement compared to 50 Hz AC testing

  • Portable test equipment, suitable for field use

  • Non-destructive when done with diagnostics (e.g., TD, PD)

  • Effective insulation aging detection

  • IEEE and IEC recognized for MV cable testing

  • Faster testing compared to DC leakage or 50 Hz testing

Disadvantages of VLF Testing

  • Not always suitable for HV extruded cables above 132 kV

  • Cannot simulate full 50/60 Hz behavior, especially for capacitive/reactive effects

  • Withstand-only VLF doesn’t provide condition trends (unlike TD or PD)

  • Test setup may require disconnection or cable preparation

  • For PD detection, sensitivity can be affected by cable geometry or accessories

See also  Protection of Electricity Distribution Networks (Energy Engineering) 4th Edition

Alternatives to VLF Testing

  1. DC Hipot Testing

    • Older method, stresses insulation differently

    • Can be damaging to XLPE insulation (not recommended)

  2. Power Frequency Testing (50/60 Hz)

    • Accurate but needs heavy, high-power equipment

  3. Very Low Frequency with Partial Discharge (VLF-PD)

    • More advanced diagnostic method

  4. Damped AC (DAC) Testing

    • More accurate at detecting PD and insulation issues

  5. Online PD Monitoring

    • Real-time, condition-based assessment under operating voltage

  6. Tan Delta Testing (50 Hz)

    • Can be done at normal power frequency if feasible

Relevant Standards

Standard Title
IEEE 400 Guide for Field Testing and Evaluation of Insulation of Shielded Power Cable
IEEE 400.2 Guide for Field Testing of Shielded Power Cable Systems Using VLF
IEEE 400.3 Guide for Partial Discharge Testing of Shielded Power Cable
IEC 60502-2 Power cables with extruded insulation and their accessories for rated voltages from 1 kV to 30 kV
IEC 60229 Tests on cable oversheaths

Cable Insulation Testing Methods Comparison

Criteria VLF Testing DAC Testing Online PD Testing
Full Name Very Low Frequency Testing Damped Alternating Current Testing Online Partial Discharge Monitoring
Frequency Range 0.1 Hz (typical) 20–500 Hz (damped waveform) 50/60 Hz (operating frequency)
Test Type Offline diagnostic or withstand Offline diagnostic Online, non-intrusive
Purpose Insulation aging (Tan Delta), withstand PD detection and localization Continuous PD monitoring
Stress Similarity to Operating Conditions Moderate High Exact (operates at service voltage)
Power Requirement Low Medium None (uses system voltage)
PD Detection Capability Moderate (VLF-PD) High Very High
Tan Delta Testing Yes (optional) No No
Fault Localization Not possible Yes (precise PD location) Not directly; trending only
Cable Disconnection Required Yes Yes No
Test Duration Short to medium (15–60 min) Short Continuous or periodic
Risk of Damage to Aged Cables Low if diagnostics used; withstand has risk Low None
Portability High Medium High
Use Case Commissioning, post-repair, condition monitoring Commissioning, aging assessment Condition-based maintenance, early warning
Best For MV cables (up to 66 kV) MV/HV cables (up to 220+ kV) Mission-critical systems (e.g., substations, BESS)
Standards IEEE 400.2, IEC 60502 IEEE 400.4 IEC 60270, IEC 62478
See also  Motor Protection -Direct Temperature Sensing

Summary Recommendations

  • Use VLF when you need a cost-effective, portable option for MV cable diagnostics (Tan Delta + Withstand).

  • Use DAC when you need accurate PD localization for HV cables and want to simulate operating stress with fewer risks.

  • Use Online PD when cables are in service, and early detection is critical, especially in critical infrastructure like data centers, substations, or BESS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.