Where reliability and safety are paramount in a power system, selecting the right transformer cooling method can have a significant impact on performance, maintenance, and long-term costs. Two commonly used cooling methods—ONAN (Oil Natural Air Natural) and KNAN (K-Class Insulating Fluid, Natural Air Natural)—each offer distinct advantages and trade-offs.
Understanding the Basics
ONAN transformers use mineral oil as the cooling and insulating medium, relying on natural convection to dissipate heat. This traditional method is widely used due to its cost-effectiveness and efficiency. However, mineral oil comes with environmental concerns and a moderate fire risk due to its lower flash point.
On the other hand, KNAN transformers utilize ester-based insulating fluids, which are biodegradable and have a significantly higher fire point, making them a safer alternative. Though slightly more expensive, they provide better moisture tolerance and are ideal for applications where environmental and fire safety considerations are critical.
Applications
Where transformers operate under high loads and harsh conditions, the choice between ONAN and KNAN depends on multiple factors:
-
Location & Fire Safety: If the transformer is located outdoors, where fire hazards are minimal, ONAN is often the preferred choice due to its proven performance and lower initial cost. However, if the transformer is placed indoors or near sensitive equipment, KNAN becomes the better option because of its high flash point and reduced fire risk.
-
Environmental Regulations: In environmentally sensitive areas, such as near water bodies or in eco-regulated zones, KNAN transformers are favored due to their biodegradable insulating fluid. Unlike mineral oil, which can pose contamination risks, ester fluids are safer and easier to manage in case of leaks.
-
Reliability & Maintenance: Plants operating in humid or coastal regions may benefit from KNAN transformers, as they are less affected by moisture ingress. Their superior dielectric performance ensures continued insulation reliability even in high-humidity environments, reducing the risk of insulation degradation over time.
-
Cost Considerations: ONAN transformers remain the more economical choice, making them suitable for generator step-up (GSU) transformers that are installed outdoors and where fire risk is manageable. However, for auxiliary transformers or station service transformers housed inside control rooms, the additional cost of KNAN may be justified for the enhanced safety and regulatory compliance it provides.
International Standards
Several international standards regulate ONAN and KNAN transformer cooling:
-
IEC 60076-2 – Specifies temperature rise limits and cooling classes.
-
IEC 60076-7 – Guides the loading and operation of liquid-filled transformers.
-
IEC 60296 – Governs mineral insulating oils for transformers (ONAN).
-
IEC 61099 – Governs synthetic ester-based insulating liquids (KNAN).
-
IEEE C57.12.00 – Covers general requirements for liquid-immersed transformers.
-
IEEE C57.147 – Guides maintenance and application of natural esters (KNAN).
Final Verdict
For most transformers applications, ONAN cooling is recommended due to its balance of cost and efficiency. However, for indoor transformers, fire-sensitive areas, or environmentally regulated zones, KNAN is the better choice, ensuring both safety and sustainability.
By making the right selection, power plants can optimize transformer performance while ensuring safety, regulatory compliance, and long-term operational reliability.